By Sri Prabhav Paturi
The Bhagavad Gita, a seminal text in Hinduism, is renowned for its diverse philosophical influences, including Sankhya, Yoga, and Vedanta.1 Among these, Sankhya’s atheistic and dualistic metaphysics seemingly stand in contrast to the Gita’s overarching theistic and devotional themes.2
This article explores how Sankhya’s metaphysical concepts are reconciled within the Gita’s Dharmic framework and compares them with metaphysical constructs in modern psychology.
By understanding this synthesis, we gain insights into the psychological impact of the Gita’s teachings on the religious Hindu mind.
1. Understanding Sankhya Philosophy and Its Metaphysics
Sankhya is one of the oldest philosophical systems in India, dating back to the 6th century BCE.3 Its core metaphysical principles revolve around the dualism of Purusha (consciousness) and Prakriti (matter). Purusha is the eternal, unchanging, and passive witness, while Prakriti is the ever-changing, active, and material principle.4 Sankhya posits that the universe evolves through the interplay of these two principles, without the need for a supreme deity.5
The Sankhya Karika, a foundational text of the Sankhya school, states:
“Purusha is neither productive nor produced; Prakriti is productive and produced. The union of these two is the cause of the universe.” (Sankhya Karika, Verse 3) 6
This verse encapsulates the atheistic nature of Sankhya, which sets it apart from other Indian philosophical schools. It focuses on the analysis of the self and the universe through a dualistic and non-theistic lens.7 By understanding the distinction between Purusha and Prakriti, an individual can attain liberation from the cycle of birth and death.8
2. Sankhya in the Bhagavad Gita: A Dharmic Reconciliation
The Bhagavad Gita skilfully integrates Sankhya’s metaphysical concepts within a Dharmic framework, reconciling its atheistic roots with devotional theism.9 In the Gita, Lord Krishna presents Sankhya’s analytical approach as a means to understand the nature of the self and the universe, while simultaneously emphasising the importance of devotion (Bhakti) and righteous action (Karma).10
In Chapter 2, Verse 39, Krishna states:
“This wisdom I have declared to you is according to Sankhya. Now listen to the wisdom according to Yoga, endowed with which, O Partha, you shall cast off the bondage of action.” (Bhagavad Gita, 2.39) 11
Here, Krishna acknowledges the value of Sankhya’s analytical approach while also introducing the path of Yoga, which emphasises devotion and action. This synthesis allows the religious Hindu mind to resolve inner conflicts and achieve mental clarity. By understanding the distinction between the eternal self (Purusha) and the transient material world (Prakriti), one can cultivate detachment and equanimity.12 At the same time, the Gita’s emphasis on devotion allows the individual to maintain a personal connection with the divine, fostering a sense of purpose and emotional fulfilment.13
3. Psychological Metaphysics vs. Sankhya’s Metaphysics
Metaphysics in psychology explores the fundamental nature of consciousness, self, and existence from a psychological perspective.14 While there are parallels between psychological metaphysics and Sankhya’s dualistic view of consciousness and matter, there are also significant differences.
Sankhya’s concept of Purusha as the eternal, unchanging witness bears some resemblance to the psychological notion of the “observing self” or “transcendent self.”15 However, Sankhya’s strict dualism and emphasis on detachment differ from psychology’s often materialistic and ego-centric view of the self.16
Modern psychology tends to view consciousness as an emergent property of the brain, whereas Sankhya considers consciousness (Purusha) to be independent of matter (Prakriti).17 This fundamental difference in the understanding of consciousness has implications for how the self is conceptualised and how mental well-being is approached.
From a Vedic psychology perspective, modern psychology’s materialistic and reductionistic approach to consciousness fails to account for the transcendent nature of the self and the importance of cultivating detachment from the material world.18 By focusing primarily on the ego and its attachments, modern psychology may inadvertently perpetuate suffering rather than alleviate it.19
4. Applications to the Religious Hindu Mind
For a religious Hindu, the Bhagavad Gita’s integration of Sankhya’s metaphysical concepts within a Dharmic framework offers a powerful tool for mental well-being. By understanding the distinction between the eternal self (Purusha) and the transient material world (Prakriti), one can cultivate detachment and resilience in the face of life’s challenges.20
In Chapter 2, Verse 14, Krishna explains:
“The contacts between the senses and the sense objects give rise to fleeting perceptions of happiness and distress. These are non-permanent and come and go like the winter and summer seasons. O descendent of Bharata, one must learn to tolerate them without being disturbed.” (Bhagavad Gita, 2.14) 21
This verse illustrates how the application of Sankhya’s dualistic principles can help individuals maintain equanimity amidst the fluctuations of pleasure and pain. The Gita’s synthesis of Sankhya with Bhakti (devotion) and Karma (action) provides a holistic approach to psychological well-being. Devotion to a higher power fosters a sense of connection and purpose, while the practice of detached action promotes mental clarity and emotional balance.22
A prime example of this is Arjuna’s crisis in the Bhagavad Gita. Faced with the prospect of fighting against his own family members, Arjuna experiences intense emotional turmoil.23 Krishna uses Sankhya concepts to help Arjuna understand the distinction between the eternal self and the temporary material world, encouraging him to fulfil his duty as a warrior with detachment and devotion.24 This illustrates how Sankhya’s metaphysical principles can be applied within a Dharmic context to promote psychological resilience and clarity of purpose.
5. The Role of Atheistic Concepts in a Theistic Context: Cognitive Dissonance or Harmony?
The presence of Sankhya’s atheistic metaphysics within the theistic framework of the Bhagavad Gita may appear to create cognitive dissonance. However, a closer examination reveals that the Gita’s synthesis of these seemingly disparate elements creates a harmonious whole.25
From a psychological perspective, the Gita’s integration of Sankhya helps resolve potential conflicts in belief systems by presenting a nuanced understanding of the self and the universe. By acknowledging the dualistic nature of Purusha and Prakriti, while simultaneously emphasising the importance of devotion and righteous action, the Gita offers a path to inner peace that transcends strict theistic or atheistic boundaries.26
The Gita’s use of Sankhya concepts demonstrates that atheistic ideas can provide value and insight within a broader, spiritually inclined worldview. By focusing on the practical applications of Sankhya’s metaphysics for mental well-being, the Gita shows that the ultimate goal is the alleviation of suffering, irrespective of one’s theistic beliefs.27
6. Implications for Modern Psychological Practice
The Bhagavad Gita’s integration of Sankhya’s metaphysical concepts offers valuable lessons for modern psychological practice. By understanding the distinction between the eternal self (Purusha) and the transient material world (Prakriti), psychologists can help clients cultivate detachment and resilience in the face of life’s challenges.28
The Gita’s emphasis on the importance of context in applying philosophical concepts is also relevant for psychology. Just as Sankhya’s atheistic ideas are adapted within the Gita’s theistic framework, psychological interventions must be tailored to the unique cultural, religious, and personal contexts of each individual.29
Techniques derived from Sankhya, such as mindfulness and self-reflection, can be incorporated into therapeutic practice to help clients manage anxiety, foster resilience, and achieve mental clarity.30 By integrating these Dharmic principles into modern psychological understanding, practitioners can develop a more holistic approach to mental health that acknowledges the interdependence of the mind, body, and spirit. 31
If there are fellow Psychologists who are reading this article, to them I give out something that I practice as an intervention method as a Vedic Psychologist, closely related to this article:
Psychoeducation: Introduce clients to the core concepts of Sankhya philosophy, such as the distinction between Purusha (consciousness) and Prakriti (matter), and the importance of cultivating detachment from the material world. Use relevant verses from the Bhagavad Gita to illustrate these concepts and their practical applications.
Mindfulness practice: Guide clients through mindfulness exercises that focus on observing thoughts, emotions, and sensations without attachment or aversion. Encourage clients to identify with the eternal, unchanging witness (Purusha) rather than the transient experiences of the material world (Prakriti).
Values clarification: Help clients identify their core values and explore how these values align with the principles of Dharma as presented in the Bhagavad Gita. Encourage clients to reflect on their duties and responsibilities in light of these values, and to cultivate a sense of detached action (Karma Yoga).
Devotional practice: For clients who are receptive to theistic practices, introduce devotional techniques such as chanting, prayer, or meditation on a chosen deity. Emphasize the importance of cultivating a personal connection with the divine as a means of fostering emotional resilience and a sense of purpose.
Cognitive reframing: Use the Bhagavad Gita’s teachings to help clients reframe their challenges and setbacks as opportunities for spiritual growth and self-discovery. Encourage clients to view their experiences through the lens of Sankhya’s dualistic metaphysics, recognising the impermanence of pleasure and pain, and the ultimate reality of the eternal self.
Behavioural activation: Help clients identify and engage in activities that align with their values and promote a sense of detached action. Encourage clients to perform their duties with dedication and focus, while remaining detached from the outcomes of their actions.
By integrating these elements into a cohesive intervention method, Vedic psychologists can offer a culturally sensitive and holistic approach to mental health that draws upon the rich tradition of Sankhya philosophy and the Bhagavad Gita. This approach has the potential to complement and enhance modern psychological practice, while also providing a much-needed counterpoint to the materialistic and reductionistic tendencies of contemporary psychology.
Conclusion
The Bhagavad Gita’s integration of Sankhya’s atheistic metaphysics within a Dharmic framework demonstrates the flexibility and adaptability of these ancient philosophical concepts. By reconciling Sankhya’s dualistic view of Purusha and Prakriti with devotional theism, the Gita offers a path to psychological well-being that is both pragmatic and spiritually fulfilling.
The distinction between psychological metaphysics and Sankhya’s approach highlights the importance of considering cultural and philosophical context when examining concepts of the self and consciousness. The Gita’s synthesis of these ideas illustrates how seemingly disparate elements can be harmonised to create a holistic understanding of the human experience.
As modern psychology continues to evolve, the integration of Dharmic principles, including Sankhya’s metaphysical concepts, offers a rich source of insight for the development of culturally sensitive and holistic approaches to mental health. By embracing the wisdom of the Bhagavad Gita, psychologists can help clients navigate the complexities of the human mind and find lasting peace and resilience in the face of life’s challenges.
From a Vedic psychology perspective, the proposed Sankhya-Bhagavad Gita intervention method represents a much-needed corrective to the limitations and biases of modern psychology. By grounding therapeutic practice in the timeless wisdom of Sankhya philosophy and the Bhagavad Gita, Vedic psychologists can offer a truly holistic and transformative approach to mental health that honours the spiritual dimensions of the human experience.
Author: Sri Prabhav Paturi is a Business Strategist and Executive Coach, renowned for developing the Vedic Psychology modality. Ordained by his Guru Parampara, he leads Vyoma Bindu Akhada, spreading Hindu Dharma through Aghora Tantra and Yoga, while offering free spiritual guidance. In addition, he collaborates with companies like Blue Capuchin, Brahman Studios, and Manoloka Holistic Wellness Clinic. Passionate about blending ancient wisdom with modern solutions, he aims to create a sustainable ecosystem where Dharma and modernity coexist.
The article was first published on www.esamskriti.com, We have republished it with kind permission from the Editor under our global content-sharing initiative.
References
1. Deutsch, Eliot, and Rohit Dalvi, eds. The essential Vedanta: A new source book of Advaita Vedanta. World Wisdom, Inc, 2004.
2. Raju, P. T. “The philosophical traditions of India.” (1971).
3. Larson, Gerald James. Classical Sāṃkhya: An interpretation of its history and meaning. Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 2001.
4. Larson, Gerald James, and Ram Shankar Bhattacharya, eds. Sānkhya: A dualist tradition in Indian philosophy. Vol. 13. Princeton University Press, 2014.
5. Burley, Mikel. Classical Samkhya and Yoga: An Indian metaphysics of experience. Routledge, 2014.
6. Sharma, Har Dutt, ed. Sāṁkhyakārikā. Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 1933.
7. Dasgupta, Surendranath. A history of Indian philosophy. Vol. 1. Motilal Banarsidass Publishe, 1975.
8. Larson, Gerald James. “Classical yoga as neo-Sāṃkhya: A chapter in the history of Indian philosophy.” Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques (1999): 723-732.
9. Upadhyaya, Kashi Nath. “The Bhagavad Gita on war and peace.” Philosophy East and West 19.2 (1969): 159-169.
10. Sargeant, Winthrop. The Bhagavad Gita. SUNY Press, 2009.
11. Bhagavad Gita. Translated by Swami Chidbhavananda. Sri Ramakrishna Tapovanam, 1997.
12. Deutsch, Eliot. “Bhagavad Gītā.” (1980).
13. Malinar, Angelika. The Bhagavad Gita: Doctrines and contexts. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
14. Baker, Lynne Rudder. “Metaphysics and mental causation.” Mental causation (1993): 75-96.
15. Albahari, Miri. Analytical Buddhism: The two-tiered illusion of self. Springer, 2006.
16. Watts, Geoff. “Bringing psychology to the masses.” New Scientist 238.3182 (2018): 42-45.
17. Kak, Subhash. “From Vedic science to Vedanta.” Adyar Library Bulletin 59 (1995): 1-36.
18. Singh, R. Raj, and Rama Ghose. “The concept of mind and cognition in Indian philosophy with specific reference to Vedic literature: implications in contemporary psychology.” Psychological Studies 61.2 (2016): 126-136.
19. Paranjpe, Anand C. “Indian psychology: Implications and applications.” Indian psychology 5 (2016): 1-27.
20. Coward, Harold G. “The Bhagavad Gita and modern psychotherapy.” The Bhagavad Gita and modern scholarship. RoutledgeCurzon, 2007. 109-127.
21. Bhagavad Gita. Translated by Eknath Easwaran. Nilgiri Press, 2007.
22. Thakkar, Maya B. “Finding Common Ground between East and West, Ancient and Modern: The Place of the Bhagavad Gita in the Works of Carl Jung.” The Pluralist 11.2 (2016): 22-35.
23. Narasimhan, Chakravarthi V. The Mahābhārata: An English Version Based on Selected Verses. Columbia University Press, 1965.
24. Vanita, Ruth. “The Bhagavad Gita in Dialogue with Disability.” Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought 36.1-2 (2017): 98-113.
25. Brockington, J. L. “The Mahabharata: What is not Here is Nowhere Else. Yannehasti Na Tadkvacit.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 60.3 (1997): 533-535.
26. Theodor, Ithamar. Exploring the Bhagavad Gitā: Philosophy, Structure, and Meaning. Routledge, 2016.
27. Edgerton, Franklin. The Bhagavad Gita. Vol. 1. Harvard University Press, 1952.
28. Rao, K. Ramakrishna. “Ayurveda and modern psychology.” Indian Psychology 24 (2006): 7-33.
29. Chirban, Sharon. “Yoga and the spiritual life: the journey home: A psycho-spiritual approach to human growth.” JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHOANALYSIS 30.2 (2002): 367-367.
30. Rao, K. Ramakrishna. “Approaches to Indian Psychology: Classical, Modern and Post-Modern.” Journal of Indian Psychology 1.1 (2008): 1-14.
31. Singh, Neha, Deshpande, Manish, and Sudhir, Paulomi. “A Qualitative Exploration into Life-Orientations in Ancient Indian Texts: Bhagavad-Gītā.” Indian Journal of Positive Psychology 2.2 (2011): 114.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. The Australia Today is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information in this article. All information is provided on an as-is basis. The information, facts, or opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of The Australia Today and The Australia Today News does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.
Support Our Journalism
Global Indian Diaspora and Australia’s multicultural communities need fair, non-hyphenated, and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. The Australia Today – with exceptional reporters, columnists, and editors – is doing just that. Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.
Whether you live in Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, the United States of America, or India you can take a paid subscription by clicking Patreon and support honest and fearless journalism. LINK: https://tinyurl.com/TheAusToday