Australians face a serious challenge to their freedom of speech as the Albanese Government pushes forward with new Misinformation laws to curate false information online. Critics argue that the proposed legislation, set to be voted on in federal parliament in the coming weeks, poses a significant threat to everyday Australians’ right to free expression.
The Coalition, led by the Shadow Minister for Communications, David Coleman, is mounting a strong opposition to the bill, arguing that it is a dangerous attempt to censor free speech.
The Concerns: Who Gets to Define ‘Misinformation’?
The Misinformation Bill, as outlined by the Albanese Government, seeks to give digital platforms the authority to remove content deemed as misinformation, to reduce harmful falsehoods that could spread online. However, the controversy surrounding the bill is largely about how misinformation is defined and who has the power to enforce these definitions.
David Coleman, the Shadow Minister for Communications, voiced his concerns that the bill could lead to widespread censorship.
“Under the Government’s plan, something can be ‘misinformation’ even if it is the honestly held opinion of an everyday Australian,”
said Coleman.
The bill allows for statements to be labelled as misinformation even if they are not malicious or intended to deceive—an issue that many see as dangerous for free speech.
The bill notably exempts academics, scientists, artists, and comedians from its regulations, but everyday citizens are not provided the same protections. This creates an uneven playing field where professional commentators are free to express their views, while ordinary Australians may be restricted in what they can say online.
Government Control and The Role of the Communications Minister
A key concern highlighted by the Coalition is the extensive powers granted to the Communications Minister under the proposed legislation.
Coleman says, the Minister would have the ability to order Misinformation Investigations and Hearings at her discretion.
“It’s very concerning that the Communications Minister can personally order Misinformation Investigations and Misinformation Hearings, on terms of her choosing,”
Coleman stated, warning that such powers could lead to politically motivated censorship.
The bill also imposes significant penalties on digital platforms that fail to remove content labelled as misinformation. The fear is that these platforms, facing the threat of huge fines, may take a heavy-handed approach to moderation to avoid penalties. This could lead to the removal of legitimate, honestly-held opinions by Australians who are simply engaging in public discourse.
Impact on Religious Beliefs and Open Debate
According to Coleman, one of the most contentious aspects of the bill is its potential impact on the communication of religious beliefs. The legislation allows digital platforms and government authorities to determine whether a belief is ‘reasonable,’ raising concerns about state interference in matters of faith.
“A core problem of the planned legislation is that it empowers digital platforms and government bureaucrats to determine whether or not a religious belief is ‘reasonable’,” Coleman argued.
“This flies in the face of the separation of church and state and is completely unacceptable.”
The Coalition has also pointed to the use of the term ‘misinformation’ during last year’s Voice referendum debate, arguing that the new laws could have been used to stifle legitimate debate if they had been in place at that time.
“Many Australians will recall all the times the Prime Minister and his MPs referred to any comments they didn’t like in the Voice referendum as ‘misinformation’.
If these laws had been in place last year, there is no doubt Labor would have used them in an attempt to stifle debate,”
Coleman said.
A Call to Action for the Senate
The Misinformation Bill is scheduled for a vote in the Senate in late November. The Coalition is urging all Senators to vote against what they view as an overly broad and dangerous piece of legislation. Coleman emphasized the need to protect free speech and prevent the government from imposing new restrictions on what Australians can say online.
“It is of the highest importance that this bill is defeated in the federal parliament. We cannot allow the Albanese Government to impose a new censorship regime on all Australians,”
he stated.
The debate over the Misinformation Bill highlights the ongoing tension between regulating harmful content online and preserving the fundamental right to free speech. While the government insists the legislation is necessary to combat the spread of dangerous misinformation, critics argue that it places too much power in the hands of bureaucrats and digital platforms, potentially silencing voices that simply hold differing views.
As the Senate prepares to vote, Australians from all walks of life are being urged to consider the implications of the bill—both in terms of combating harmful misinformation and in safeguarding their right to freely express their beliefs and opinions. The outcome of this vote will determine how Australia balances these crucial yet competing interests in the years to come.
———————————————————————————————————————————-
Support Our Journalism
Global Indian Diaspora and Australia’s multicultural communities need fair, non-hyphenated, and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. The Australia Today – with exceptional reporters, columnists, and editors – is doing just that. Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.
Whether you live in Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, the United States of America, or India you can take a paid subscription by clicking Patreon and support honest and fearless journalism. LINK: https://tinyurl.com/TheAusToday
