On Friday evening, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen was “beaten” by a man in a Copenhagen square at Kultorvet. The man was subsequently arrested by police and no further comments or remarks on the case has been released.
The prime minister is “shocked by the incident” and there has been a quick widespread condemnation of such “violence against democratically elected leaders in our free societies.”
In recent days, several incidents involving violence and threats towards peaceful citizens and Members of Parliament (MPs) across various democracies have raised concerns about the potential normalisation of such behaviour. From physical assaults to stalking and vandalism of property, these actions undermine the principles of democracy and respect for public office. Examining incidents from Australia, India, and Canada offers a sobering insight into this disturbing trend.
In Australia, the elected representatives are in shock at the number of these alarming incidents, with the offices of several Labor MPs, including Federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus anmd Minister Bill Shorten, being targeted with vandalism in Melbourne. Graffiti on the building included the phrases “Free Gaza” and “Glory to the martyrs.” The use of red paint and graffiti is symbolic, often intended to convey an aggressive message. Vandalism of elected representatives offices disrupts their ability to serve their constituents effectively and sends a message that others who may oppose that those in public office are not safe from extremist’s wrath, even in their professional spaces.
In India, a woman Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) constable, Kulwinder Kaur, allegedly slapped newly elected Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Kangana Ranaut at an airport. Kaur has been charged under Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restraint) of the Indian Penal Code, yet no arrest has been made. This incident, involving a high-profile MP known for her strong stance against Khalistan extremism and outspoken nature, highlights the increasing tension and potential for physical confrontations between public figures and so-called activists. The lack of immediate arrest in this case raises questions about the enforcement of laws designed to protect citizens and whether such acts are being taken seriously enough by the Indian authorities.
In Canada, MP Kevin Vuong, elected for Spadina—Fort York, reported being followed and photographed by an unknown woman while out with his wife. Vuong, known for his vocal stance on antisemitism, described this incident as intimidating and invasive. The incident, as well as photographs of the drivers and their licence plate, were shared with both parliamentary security personnel and Toronto police.
While Prime Minister keeps repeating “rule of law” as a mantra, this form of non-physical harassment signifies a shift towards psychological intimidation, aiming to create a climate of fear and discomfort among Candian politicians who oppose Hamas. Such actions not only endanger the personal security of MPs and their loved ones but also threaten to stifle free speech and robust political debate, as MPs may become hesitant to voice strong opinions if they fear retribution.
Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has denounced protests outside Labor’s offices and alleged intimidation of MPs and their staff as a bad development for democracy. Albanese said the “blockade” of his own office had been supported by “Greens and state Greens”.
In a Senate committee hearing Foreign Minister Senator Penny Wong accused the Greens of “participating in protests which have become violent and aggressive.”
“What we have seen are protests which go beyond peaceful protests, we have a right to peaceful protest in this country. But we should rightly condemn protests which are violent and which are hateful and aggressive.”
Peter Khalil, the chair of parliament’s committee of intelligence and security, told Guardian Australia that “violence, intimidation, harassment, hate speech and damage of property crosses the line and needs to be called out.” He added that the Greens’ approach to the conflict had been “morally reprehensible” and also accused them of “whipping up anger and grievance, making things worse” in pursuit of votes. Labor MP for Higgins, Michelle Ananda-Rajah, agreed and has also accused the Greens of causing “social unrest.”
The Australian Greens rejected Labor’s claims as “not correct”: “The Greens support peaceful protest, we will continue to do so, and we support the protest organisers’ calls for no property damage or breakage.”
These incidents across different democratic nations point to a worrying trend where violence and threats towards citizens and MPs are becoming more frequent and, arguably, more accepted and even celebrated on social media. This normalization can have severe consequences for democracy.
First, it undermines the rule of law and the sanctity of democratic institutions. When MPs are attacked, either physically or psychologically, it diminishes the respect for the positions they hold and the democratic process they represent. Second, if the personal cost of public service includes a heightened risk of violence and harassment of loved ones, these increasing threats and acts of violence can deter capable individuals from entering politics.
Democracies thrive on healthy debate and peaceful protests are a legitimate form of democratic expression, allowing citizens to voice their concerns and hold public officials accountable. However, the challenge lies in distinguishing between legitimate, non-violent protest and extremist ideological propaganda masked as activism that cross the line into violence and intimidation.
Upholding the integrity and safety of public officials is fundamental to the health of our democracies. Law enforcement agencies in Australia, India and Canada must take a consistent stand to send a clear message on consequences for those who engage in such extremist and violent behavior. Through a commitment to civil discourse, we can ensure that our political representatives can perform their duties without fear of violence or intimidation.
Support Our Journalism
‘Global Indian Diaspora and Australia’s multicultural communities need fair, non-hyphenated, and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. The Australia Today – with exceptional reporters, columnists, and editors – is doing just that. Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.
Whether you live in Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, the United States of America, or India you can take a paid subscription by clicking Patreon and support honest and fearless journalism.
